Evan’s good friend Mark Halperin of TIME told Politico that the 2008 election was tainted by extreme media bias and pro-Obama coverage. I love media retrospectives.
“It’s the most disgusting failure of people in our business since the Iraq war,” Halperin said, pointing out two profiles from the New York Times concerning potential first ladies Cindy McCain (which he called “vicious” and negative) and Michelle Obama (which he called a “front-page endorsement of what a great person she is.”)
“I think it’s incumbent upon people in our business to make sure that we’re being fair,” he said. “The daily output was the most disparate of any campaign I’ve ever covered, by far.”
Halperin’s assertions led me to do some fact-checking of my own, and by “my own” I mean “screaming at interns to do this for me.” (The worst part? Since they’re constantly rotating, I don’t even bother to learn their names. I just call them Intern 1, Intern 2, and Intern 3.)
Turns out that Halperin’s coverage of the election was pretty balanced overall, but then again, his typical blog posts run somewhere between one and three sentences—not much room for analysis and opinion.
Back in January during the primaries, Halperin appeared on CNN and said this:
Yes, [critical press coverage] hurt [Hillary] badly and it continues, I think, to potentially hurt her badly. We are still at a tipping point, I think, in the Obama coverage. Will it be laudatory and breathless and say, isn’t this exciting, or will he get the kind of scrutiny that a front-runner normally gets?
Here’s what he said in December:
Hillary’s just held to a different standard in every respect. The press rooted for Obama to go negative, and when he did, he was applauded. When she does it, it’s treated as this huge violation of propriety. It’s not a level playing field.
As far as primary coverage was concerned, clearly there was bias because the media hates women, especially women named Hillary. The coverage during the general election, however, seemed to be more positively skewed toward Obama because he was running a phenomenal campaign. Or maybe they were all like Chris Matthews and totally smitten.